<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CFB Section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cfbsection.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cfbsection.com</link>
	<description>College Football All Year</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brent Musburger straight up doesn&#8217;t care ESPN by greg</title>
		<link>http://cfbsection.com/21032/brent-musburger-straight-up-doesnt-care-espn/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfbsection.com/?p=21032#comment-1769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why do teams have players with same number.  There are 99 poosibilities and teams do not suit that many players.  I don&#039;t care if one is on defense and one on offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do teams have players with same number.  There are 99 poosibilities and teams do not suit that many players.  I don&#8217;t care if one is on defense and one on offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed NCAA rule would ban Boise State&#8217;s all-blue unis by ray breshears</title>
		<link>http://cfbsection.com/21923/proposed-ncaa-rule-would-ban-boise-states-all-blue-unis/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>ray breshears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfbsection.com/?p=21923#comment-1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so the any team with green unis should not have green turf, or the Washington State Cougars should have to change their crimson turf?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the any team with green unis should not have green turf, or the Washington State Cougars should have to change their crimson turf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposed NCAA rule would ban Boise State&#8217;s all-blue unis by Nincapoop</title>
		<link>http://cfbsection.com/21923/proposed-ncaa-rule-would-ban-boise-states-all-blue-unis/comment-page-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Nincapoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfbsection.com/?p=21923#comment-1767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rule should just be that Boise State has to get rid of their god awful blue field.  Man is that crap ugly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule should just be that Boise State has to get rid of their god awful blue field.  Man is that crap ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 10 New Proposed Rules for College Football by Sozo</title>
		<link>http://cfbsection.com/21936/the-10-new-proposed-rules-for-college-football/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Sozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfbsection.com/?p=21936#comment-1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spiking the ball should be outlawed.  It&#039;s not much different than intentional grounding. The idea is basically the same. The advantage goes to the offense. 

Are not today&#039;s players intelligent enough to know and run a play without spiking the ball? It&#039;s a joke and prolongs the game, just as does instant replay. 

Years ago I saw that instant replay was going to ruin the game, and it has, at least for me. I&#039;m speaking mostly of pro ball. Announcers go off on the indisputable evidence, etc.  ad nauseam. They&#039;re chatter and constant replaying is repetitive and boring. Need I add insulting? Outlaw instant replay and let the refs call the game. Everything will balance out in the end and the game will be much shorter, and interesting. Fans can argue and complain about bad calls all year.

While I&#039;m here, what&#039;s the 2 minute warning for? Don&#039;t these idiots know how to tell time? The 2 minute warning, spiking the ball, incomplete passes, time outs, and whatever else I&#039;ve forgotten, can take 2 minutes and turn it into 20 actual minutes, and nothing happens but a field goal try in the end. Boring! . . . My solution here is simple,  no 2 minute warning, give each team an extra time out (20 seconds) or two. Once they reach  2 minutes to go,  &quot;never&quot; stop the clock (incomplete pass or not) . Lets move the game along. They can use their timeouts.

And while I&#039;m here, there is no advantage to the receiving team during an onside kick. The advantage goes to the kicking team that most likely has lost the game so why give them an extra advantage. Some of these things may be fun and exciting but they&#039;re unfair, and to me boring.

Unfortunately college ball is heading the way of pro ball. Too bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiking the ball should be outlawed.  It&#8217;s not much different than intentional grounding. The idea is basically the same. The advantage goes to the offense. </p>
<p>Are not today&#8217;s players intelligent enough to know and run a play without spiking the ball? It&#8217;s a joke and prolongs the game, just as does instant replay. </p>
<p>Years ago I saw that instant replay was going to ruin the game, and it has, at least for me. I&#8217;m speaking mostly of pro ball. Announcers go off on the indisputable evidence, etc.  ad nauseam. They&#8217;re chatter and constant replaying is repetitive and boring. Need I add insulting? Outlaw instant replay and let the refs call the game. Everything will balance out in the end and the game will be much shorter, and interesting. Fans can argue and complain about bad calls all year.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m here, what&#8217;s the 2 minute warning for? Don&#8217;t these idiots know how to tell time? The 2 minute warning, spiking the ball, incomplete passes, time outs, and whatever else I&#8217;ve forgotten, can take 2 minutes and turn it into 20 actual minutes, and nothing happens but a field goal try in the end. Boring! . . . My solution here is simple,  no 2 minute warning, give each team an extra time out (20 seconds) or two. Once they reach  2 minutes to go,  &#8220;never&#8221; stop the clock (incomplete pass or not) . Lets move the game along. They can use their timeouts.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m here, there is no advantage to the receiving team during an onside kick. The advantage goes to the kicking team that most likely has lost the game so why give them an extra advantage. Some of these things may be fun and exciting but they&#8217;re unfair, and to me boring.</p>
<p>Unfortunately college ball is heading the way of pro ball. Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Ten will no longer schedule FCS schools by Bayou Bill</title>
		<link>http://cfbsection.com/21894/big-ten-will-no-longer-schedule-fcs-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayou Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfbsection.com/?p=21894#comment-1765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now they&#039;ll schedule teams that are weaker than the Div. 2 teams that have given them trouble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now they&#8217;ll schedule teams that are weaker than the Div. 2 teams that have given them trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
